AWS is the broadest service catalogue in the industry. Linode is predictable Linux compute on Akamai’s network. This page puts the two side by side — the live configurations and prices from our catalogue, then the differences that actually decide the choice.
| In our catalogue | AWS | Linode |
|---|---|---|
| Product | Buy AWS Account | Buy Linode Account |
| Configurations in stock | 30 | 3 |
| Lowest price | $20 | $25 |
| Highest price | $6,500 | $90 |
| Example options | 5 VCPU / US IP · 5 VCPU / 1 Month Old / US / High Quality · 5 VCPU / 8 Months Old / UK / High Quality | Trial $100 · Linode Service · Credit $250 |
| View options | View options |
Prices and configuration counts are read from the live catalogue. Specifications are listed exactly as supplied; nothing here is estimated.
Billing model is the real difference
Everything else on this page is secondary to one structural difference: AWS meters what you use, and Linode charges a published monthly figure. That is not a pricing detail, it is a difference in who carries the uncertainty.
With AWS you pay for exactly the compute-seconds, requests and gigabytes you consume, which is honest for elastic workloads and unnerving for fixed ones — the bill is knowable only in arrears. With Linode the number is fixed in advance and idle capacity is your problem rather than your accountant’s.
If an unexpected invoice would be a genuine problem rather than an annoyance, that constraint decides this comparison before any feature does.
Where AWS is the stronger choice
Breadth. Whatever the problem is, AWS has a managed service for it, a large body of documentation, and the deepest pool of engineers who have already solved it.
Best suited to: teams who intend to consume managed services — queues, managed databases, serverless, identity — rather than just run servers.
Regions: The widest global region footprint, including multiple regions per continent, so latency and data-residency requirements can almost always be met.
Worth knowing: Data transfer out is the line item that surprises people; on-demand list price is the worst price AWS offers, so committed-use discounts matter once the baseline is stable.
Where Linode is the stronger choice
Predictability. Plans are simple, dedicated-CPU options are available when consistent latency matters, and being part of Akamai brings a serious edge network behind it.
Best suited to: developers who want dedicated or shared vCPU at a published monthly price, without a hyperscaler’s surface area.
Regions: A broad set of regions across the Americas, Europe and Asia-Pacific, expanding under Akamai.
Worth knowing: Shared plans share a core with other tenants; if throughput must be steady, the dedicated tier is the honest choice.
The trade-offs, stated plainly
AWS: That breadth is also the cost: several services often solve the same problem with different pricing models, IAM is powerful and unforgiving, and networking is explicit in a way that is a virtue at scale and a tax on a small project.
Linode: Fewer managed services than the hyperscalers, and the platform’s own tooling is deliberately modest — it expects you to bring your own.
How to choose between them
- Choose AWS if your workload is AI and machine learning workloads on Bedrock, large multi-account organisations, and anything needing a managed service that only AWS offers
- Choose Linode if your workload is Long-running Linux servers, self-managed databases, CI runners and general-purpose hosting
- Choose neither if the shape of the work does not match either — the full catalogue has eight other platforms, and the comparison tool will hold four of them side by side.
Related reading
- Buy AWS Account — every AWS configuration in stock
- Buy Linode Account — every Linode configuration in stock
- How to choose a cloud provider — the framework behind this comparison
- How cloud billing works — why the billing model matters more than the sticker price
- Compare up to four accounts side by side
Questions
Common questions about this comparison
Is AWS cheaper than Linode?
The prices in the table above are the live catalogue prices for the accounts we stock, so you can compare those directly. Running cost is a separate question and depends on the billing model: AWS bills per unit consumed and Linode bills a fixed monthly figure, which means the cheaper account is not always the cheaper month.
Can I run the same workload on both?
For ordinary Linux servers, databases and web applications, yes. The divergence starts when you adopt a platform's proprietary managed services — a specific queue, function runtime or identity model — because those are what make a migration expensive later.
Which one is better for AI and machine learning workloads on Bedrock?
That is AWS's stated strength, so it is the natural starting point. It is still worth checking region availability and the billing model against your own constraints before committing.
What do I actually get when I buy an account here?
The configuration named on the product page and nothing beyond it — the vCPU figure, region, account age or credit exactly as listed. Both product pages set out every option in stock with its own price.